Triumph Spitfire 1500 Rev Counter

General Megajolt Questions and Answers

Moderators: JeffC, rdoherty, stieg, brentp

mikaking
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:10 pm

Triumph Spitfire 1500 Rev Counter

Post by mikaking »

Hi,

I have a problem getting my Smiths rev counter to work. It needs the high volt kick back to work. I can read half revs when i connect to one coil - as expected. I have tried the wiring diagram with the two diodes and a zener, something strange happens - The rev counter reads 850rpm as normal on tick over but as soon as i push down on the accelerator the needle rises very slightly but then drops to zero and only when the revs have dropped to tick over will it read somthing. I have tried quick recovery diodes, placing a 2.2k resistor after the zener. If i try without the zener or the reisistor i get nothing. Can someone help please.

Thanks.

brentp
Site Admin
Posts: 6275
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:36 am

Post by brentp »

Hmm- the last time this was discussed the trick was to remove the zener. You'll probably find that discussion by searching. However, in your case it doesn't seem to be working?

I'll have to defer to the other experts here for the Smiths tachometer. Is there an adjustment pot on the back of the unit?

(You had a duplicate post, so I deleted it.. Fyi)

Regards,
Brent Picasso
CEO and Founder, Autosport Labs
Facebook | Twitter

mikaking
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:10 pm

Post by mikaking »

Hi,

I have the rev counter out of the dash, there are four screws in a 'Y' formation on the back but nothing to suggest any are to make adjustments.

I've had a search for previous posts, could anyone suggest any other rated diodes that could work, as i said i have tried a couple of different types but there are so many to try it would take ages to guess the right one from pot luck. I'm definately new to electronics so am learning as i go along, Why is the suggested voltage rating for diode's on the diagram 400v, why wouldn't a lower rate be better?

Anyway, any suggestions greatly appreciated. . . . .

MartinM
Posts: 433
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 12:08 pm

Post by MartinM »

400v is definitely the right value for the diodes - it is the maximum voltage that the diodes can withstand in the reverse polarity direction before failure ie a high +ve voltage on the cathode - the bar end of the diode symbol

Each diode is subject to reverse polarity when the "other coil" is kicking back. As the high voltage kickback is in the low hundreds of volts, a 400v diode is fine and I wouldn't reduce it.

As to why you're seeing what you see, I'm not sure :(

What we really need is some reference information of how this (and other) rev counters work, and then I'm sure that something can be worked out. I've googled a bit for it but can't find anything of substance - maybe others will have better luck...

brentp
Site Admin
Posts: 6275
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:36 am

Post by brentp »

Perhaps another option would be to get one of the rev counters in question and perform more direct measurements and analysis?

The odd thing with the Smiths Rev Counter is that some people get them working with little effort, yet others continue to have problems.

Are there different variants of the Smiths Rev Counter where some of them work better for us? Are there any adjustments pots on the unit (inside or outside) that could help?

Is it the luck of the draw with different units out there factory calibrated in such a way that the marginal ones do not like the diode circuit?
Brent Picasso
CEO and Founder, Autosport Labs
Facebook | Twitter

Svein
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 11:21 am

Post by Svein »

Looks like a good source for Smiths rev counters :D

http://members.shaw.ca/tsmit/tachmod/tachmod0.html

brentp
Site Admin
Posts: 6275
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:36 am

Post by brentp »

VERY nice find! I'll add that to the wiki for sure.

Sounds like these guys are familiar with issues around the Smiths Rev Counter. Obviously there have been enough problems around the unit to warrant his 'rebuilding' effort.

Jonno
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:21 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Jonno »

I don't know if this helps, but I am using a Smiths Tacho which looks very similar to the one in the article,
however I am running it without fault in a very simple way.

The plastic insulated loop on the rear is usually for the wire from the distributor-to-coil wire to pass through.
I think the Tacho must pick up the signal via induction (?).

Anyway, I have routed one of the two EDIS coil cables through my bulkhead, and have passed it through
the loop. It has to pass through the correct direction, otherwise the Tacho appears dead.

Applying power to the tacho in the normal way gives a perfect reading - I've checked it against the configurator
display.

MartinM
Posts: 433
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 12:08 pm

Post by MartinM »

Hmmm... the theory says that it should read half rpm as each coil only sparks half as often as a single coil system :?

brentp
Site Admin
Posts: 6275
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:36 am

Post by brentp »

That is very weird. Do you have the MJLJ set to 8 cylinders buy accident? :D

Jonno
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 7:21 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Jonno »

I agree it is weird.

I thought about it before I connected it at all, and decided that if it was going to work, both coil trigger
cables between the EDIS and coil pack would have to go through, to catch all triggers, just like the old
distributor cable did.

I thought I had put both through and it worked perfectly, so I started to neaten up the cabling. That's
when I found I had actually fed through one coil trigger cable and the earth!

So, I made up the loom so just the one coil trigger goes through the tacho pickup loop, and it works perfectly.

The MJLJ is working on 4 cylinder setup.

Been thinking, though: The old distributor shaft runs at half engine speed and gives four triggers to the coil per rev.,
which is therefore 2 triggers per engine rev. The EDIS gives twice as many triggers than needed (half wasted), so
if only one trigger cable is used for the tacho, it's the same as the distributor shaft running at half speed, isn't it?

I think I could have made that clearer...

mikaking
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 12:10 pm

Post by mikaking »

I see what your saying about the wasted spark, but it is only per coil otherwise all 4 would be sparking with 3 wasted.

Very strange whats happening your end.

This thing about high voltage kick back - when i put a volt meter on the coil signal (-ve) i read about 13v and when i put the diode in it reads about 6-8v depending on the diode, i still don't get why i need diodes to cope with 400v kick back. Also what is the zener supposed to do when it can be used?

Just to clarify i am doing this right, i have taken two wires from two of the three wires that go into the "motorcraft" coil pack, ie not the 12v feed. These are the right wires I am supposed to be taking the reading from and isolating from each other to make the rev counter work?

MartinM
Posts: 433
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 12:08 pm

Post by MartinM »

You don't need diodes to cope with the flyback - you need diodes, as you say, to connect the coils together so that the rev counter see both sets of pulses but isolate them from each other.

You need 400v diodes because of the size of the flyback - use say 100v diodes and they'll fail internally, either going open or short circuit, neither of which will be much help to you.

http://www.picotech.com/auto/waveforms/ ... ition.html (plus the other waveforms at that site) is a useful thing to have a look at - it's not specifically wasted spark, but the principle is exactly the same

Gilesy998
Posts: 144
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 4:35 pm
Location: Liverpoool, UK

Post by Gilesy998 »

Surely in a standard distributor system there are only two pulses per rev generated by the coil, not four? For each cylinder to fire once, on a four-stroke otto cycle, it takes two complete revolutions of the crankshaft. In that case, using the -ve side of one primary of the coil pack in a wasted spark system gives the same two pulses as before.
I might be wrong, but it makes sense in my mind.

MartinM
Posts: 433
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 12:08 pm

Post by MartinM »

You made me draw it out to convince myself - so I might as well share it...
EDIT...where the 4 sparks in the dizzy take, as you say, 2 revolutions of the engine. But we're just looking at number of ignition events (however measured) per unit time, and from one of the wasted spark coils it is half as many as from the normal coil
Image
Last edited by MartinM on Tue May 15, 2007 7:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply